Acts 5:34-41


A. This is a very interesting passage.
1. As I studied I noted that most people see it as a ďGod ThingĒ that helped get the disciples back out on the street again to preach the gospel Ė that Gamaliel, was a sort of good conscienced man who helped the disciples Ė and I guess it is alright to see it that way.
2. But I had to wonder about Gamaliel, himself.
3. Where did he stand on the issues at hand: Jesus Christ and the gospel?
4. What was his reasoning concerning his proclamation?

B. If you read Vance Havner & others like Roy Clements in Turning the World Upside Down -Acts in Action, you might just see a different side to the story.
1. No doubt Gamaliel was revered as a great teacher as a liberal reformer somewhat ahead of his time - a moderate middle-of -the- way man, a centre-right position politically speaking.
2. And it is true, his intervention did seem to calm the fury of the council - for a short time, but in the next chapter (Acts 6) we see the same council Ė the Sanhedrin condemning and stoning Stephen.
3. Gamaliel was an appeaser, not an opposer; and appeasers have often done more harm to church than opposers.
4. Gamaliel was an apostle of compromise, unlike Peter & John who boldly proclaimed in Acts 5:29 & 32 We are witnesses of these things - We must obey God rather than men!

C. Think about this, Gamaliel was a witness of the things Peter and John talked about, as well.
1. He must have been in Jerusalem when Jesus was crucified, maybe even one of those who voted for his death and a witness, of such.
2. He knew the Scriptures, the prophecies concerning the Messiah, for he was a great teacher, perhaps The teacher of Israel
3. He should have known better than try and remain neutral or straddle the fence when it came to Jesus.
4. Agnosticism is NOT a viable option.
a. There is a Chinese proverb which states: He who deliberates fully before taking a step will spend his entire life on one leg.
b. The great philosopher Dante said it much more vigorously: The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.
5. Gamaliel was a fence straddler.

D. So where did he go wrong? Let me suggest three:
1. He made a False Comparison
2. He suggested a False Criterion
3. He Arrived at a False Conclusion

E. My prayer is that we will not find ourselves doing the same thing. May we stand with the likes of Peter, John and those throughout history who have boldly and unashamedly proclaimed the gospel of Jesus Christ.


Gamalielís first mistake was that

I. HE MADE A FALSE COMPARISON, Acts 5:34-37 Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space; [35] And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take