Hands That Shed Innocent Blood
(34)
Sermon shared by Jeffery Richards
August 2001
Summary: The third in a series of seven messages based on Proverbs 6:16-19.
Denomination: Baptist
Audience: Believer adults
About Sermon Contributor
More Sermons from Jeffery
Seven Sins to Avoid
Sermon # 3
Hands that Shed Innocent Blood
Psalm 94: 20-23
Tonight we will focus on one the hottest spiritual and political topics of all time. Please set aside your Party prefrences and focus on God’s Word
I. Abortion Devalues life..
A. The sanctity of life is the idea that all human life is given as a gift of God and that only He has to authority to give or take it.
B. Isaiah 44: 24a
C. Jer 1:5
II. America Debates the Issue.
A. The debate rages in the media around the “Health of the Mother” Did you know that the Health of the Mother, Rape, and Inscest only account for 3% of Reported reasons for abortion.
B. The medical record
1) 18 days after conception heart beats on its own.
2) 6 weeks the fetus quickly moves in the womb.
3) Brain waves present at 8 weeks & child grabs, swims freely, heartbeat measurable.
4) 12 weeks cries, sucks thumb, sleeps and wakes, All organs systems function, including mental. Can definitely feel pain.
5) From this point on nothing new develops just growth
and maturing process.
C. The viability debate.---Dr. Kent Hovind from Creation Science Evangelism says “I know 35 year old men that are not viable (able to exist without the assistance of their parents.) but we don’t support killing them…ha.”
D. The Word of God declares personhood of a child yet in the womb
Psalms 139:16
E. Dr. C. Everett Koop has said that in the future euthanasia will dwarf abortion in size and scope.
“A woman can be the twin sister of her mother, lack a biological father and be the daughter of her grandmother — if cloning scientists get their way.
The science of cloning is so inexact that 99 percent of all experiments fail, according David Humpherys, who co-authored a study by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"The (cloned) animals that make it to birth just have the fewest problems, but that’s not to say that we should expect them to be normal in any sort of way," Humpherys said.
Extend that to humans, and Humpherys said the result would be severely handicapped children.
"I think it’s fair to say, certainly at this point in time, that human cloning is a very poor idea."
Still, a determined band of scientists want to move ahead, confident they can solve the genetic anomalies. One is led by New Age priest Rael, whose company, called Clonaid, wants to help parents show future generations that "you can be like us."
That bothers Richard Doerflinger, a bioethicist with the National Conference of Catholic Bishops.
"We have a process before us that essentially reduces human procreation to total manufacture in the laboratories to specifications pre-ordained by others — the manufacture of human life as a commodity," Doerflinger said.
He noted that cloning perverts the basic relationships God has ordained.
"A woman can be the twin sister of her mother, lack a biological father and be the daughter of her grandmother."
Scientific setbacks and a Congress that may be willing to ban human cloning outright may render such bizarre scenarios moot, however.
Two competing bills are being considered in the House of Representatives. One measure, sponsored by Rep. Dave Weldon, R- Fla., in the House, and Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., in the Senate, calls for criminal penalties — fines and imprisonment — for anyone
Comments and Shared Ideas
Join the discussion











