Preaching Articles

I'm not one of those people who thinks only expository preaching (that is, preaching that relies on—rather than obliquely refers to—a passage in the Bible, explains what it says and how it applies today) is good or valid. However, I much prefer it. Much. May I say to you: Much.

Here's one reason why: There is a whole lot of preaching in churches today that makes good points and says good things in entertaining ways, but which relies mostly (or even exclusively) on the preacher's perspective and opinions rather than on sound interpretation and explanation of the Bible.

But when a preacher tasks himself or herself with a passage of Scripture and lets it decide and guide what is said from the pulpit (or, as is often the case, music stand or Plexiglas lectern), it can be both limiting and liberating. When you preach from a text, there is far less room (if you're honest) for opinions and personal prejudices to creep in. It can still be done, of course, but not so easily without raising red flags in the preacher's soul.

The problem many of us preachers face, however, is that we want to preach what we want to preach. We want to make certain points that Scripture may not make—or may not make unequivocally. But that is exactly why I prefer expository preaching, because it forces me as a student and communicator to make the points Scripture makes instead of the points I really want to make. And that's a good thing.

Bob Hostetler is a writer, editor and speaker from southeastern Ohio. His 30 books, which include Quit Going to Church and the novel The Bone Box, have sold over three million copies. He has coauthored a dozen books with Josh McDowell. Bob is a frequent speaker at churches, conferences and retreats. He has been a disc jockey, pastor, magazine editor, freelance book editor and, with his wife Robin, a foster parent to 10 boys (though not all at once).

Browse All

Related Preaching Articles

Talk about it...

Debra L. Mason

commented on Aug 2, 2013

Amen! I culdn't agree more. It is imperative that we preachers stick to the word of God instead of what is just popular. You will be surprised to find out that the Word of God, the truth often is popular and appreciated by the congregation.

Michael Washburn

commented on Aug 2, 2013

I couldn't agree with you more Bob! I have been committed to expository preaching for almost 30 years and I never cease to be amazed how a text in whatever Book I am preaching through is so timely!! The whole counsel of the Word creates healthy disciples...our hobby horses don't!

Tejado W. Hanchell

commented on Aug 2, 2013

I completely agree. Expository preaching "exposes" the text, while many other forms merely expose the preacher. I, like you, do not believe it is the only valid preaching method, but I also MUCH prefer it :-)

Jeff Glenn

commented on Aug 2, 2013

Completely agree! Great article.

Jo Vanh

commented on Aug 2, 2013

Just a thought. Why didn't Jesus or any other NT preacher preach this way? The bible does indicate that from the Books of Moses and prophets they wold explain and proclaim but for the most part none of Jesus's sermon were expository. Even Paul would teach/preach drawing from different parts of the scripture to state his case. I'm just saying:)

Rev. Phyllis Pottorff-Albrecht, United Brethren Communi

commented on Aug 2, 2013

By far, the preferred method of preaching and teaching. About 40 years ago, I worked with a church which was experiencing a problem with a dwindling Sunday School attendance. So we took a poll - NOT of the parents - but of the children who were attending Sunday School. At that time, the church had invested is S.S. Curriculum which was supposed to be "relevant" - addressing issues, such as problems at school, etc. When we finished our poll - we learned that a vast majority of Sunday School attendees who had responded to the poll had made observations which usually boiled down to: "We are disappointed with Sunday School, because we came to Sunday School to learn aobut Jesus." So we scrapped the more "relevant" curriculum and went back to sending the children home with coloring pages featuring the Life of Christ or Heroes of the Bible. The children were happier - and Sunday School attendance enjoyed an upswing. Like those children, we believe that the vast majority of people who attend church are NOT looking for news about what is "relevant" to modern society. Rather, they are searching for the guidance which comes from ancient wisdom, with tenets which have stood the test of time.

Dr Elisha Mafunga

commented on Aug 2, 2013

I believe expository preaching expose the text message while the other form of preaching represent the Preacher and this is subjective of what the preacher want to communicate to the congregation. It may at times not represent the text in the Bible.

Pastor Sung Kim

commented on Aug 3, 2013

I'm going to agree with Brother Johan here. The only people who preached "expository" during Jesus time were the Pharisees. I'm not saying expository preaching is bad. On the contrary...it's great. But there's also room for good solid topical preaching that is based on Scripture. Where we go awry is when pastors go off and take one piece of scripture or a passage out of context and run with it. I've seen that many a time and honestly during my earlier days as a pastor, I've been guilty of it. But I say again, really strong topical preaching that's biblical, convicts the listener's heart, and is a product of the Holy Spirit is just as good (and sometimes way better) than strictly going methodically through the Bible expositionally. That's my humble opinion.

Ernest D. Craig

commented on Aug 3, 2013

You really hit it right about expository preaching. I am a Certified Lay Servant/Lay Speaker in the United Methodist Church. I find it much easier to use this form of preaching when I am asked to fill in for a pastor on occasion. What the world needs is more understanding of scripture and less about the person standing up there about themselves, unless it directly relates to the scripture.

Edgar Dotson

commented on Aug 3, 2013

It seems to me that the discussion over expository or topical sermons is completely moot on both points because if any preacher is following the Word of God in context and people are touched by the power of the message and not the personality of the speaker, then it is Biblical Preaching. Both expository and topical preaching from the comments I have read is completely devoted upon the style and insight of the speaker. In my 40 years of preaching, I have heard many great expository and topical speakers delivery the Word of God with Holy Spirit leading and people are touched. Regardless if you like expository or topical, allow it to proceed from the anointing and God's people will be blessed. Neither one is greater than the other if God's Word is going forth and people are being saved and come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ. In the Church that the Lord has allowed me to pastor, I mix the two methods. On Sunday evening our church goes through books of the Bible and series sermons, and on Sunday morning it is topical and evangelistic. Let us quit debating and discussing over which is better and preach the Word in Context regardless of the method.

Edgar Dotson

commented on Aug 3, 2013

It seems to me that the discussion over expository or topical sermons is completely moot on both points because if any preacher is following the Word of God in context and people are touched by the power of the message and not the personality of the speaker, then it is Biblical Preaching. Both expository and topical preaching from the comments I have read is completely devoted upon the style and insight of the speaker. In my 40 years of preaching, I have heard many great expository and topical speakers delivery the Word of God with Holy Spirit leading and people are touched. Regardless if you like expository or topical, allow it to proceed from the anointing and God's people will be blessed. Neither one is greater than the other if God's Word is going forth and people are being saved and come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ.

Michael James Monaghan

commented on Aug 3, 2013

I'm surprised Pastor Sung Kim should think the Pharisees were devotees to expository preaching and therefore accidently making expository preaching bad !!! I prefer the scriptures expounded but I also like topical preaching or a combination of both . Sometimes though I've heard it said that at times it seems as though the preacher chooses a text and then uses it as a peg to hang his own ideas on ?. One of the best teaching methods I heard from the Open Bible Trust.org.uk to ask To whom is this scripture addressed ; What does it actually say ; Why is it written; Where is about; When was it written; and does it apply today or what application can I make of it today ?. I think it is the difference between Objective and Subjective transmitting of ideas about God's word .

Troy Pearsall

commented on Aug 4, 2013

Topical preaching may reach more people were they are, however, it often leaves that person where it found them. What I'm saying is that we many not reach as many people with expository preaching, but the people we reach will be transformed by it. At least that's my take on the subject. Great Article

Jb Bryant

commented on Aug 5, 2013

It's kind of silly to say that Pharisees were expository preachers - the were terribly guilty of eisegesis, injecting human tradition into scriptural snippets and propounding rabbinical interpretations and opinions rather than opening God's Word. This would be similar to preaching through a book written by a Christian author (which is essentially topical preaching). And Jesus didn't need to open the Word Of God and preach expositorally - He IS the Word Of God! As for others, we do see Peter opening up the scriptures throughout Acts (it looks different to us since they didn't generally use chapter and verse references). Besides Peter, though, we don't have many examples of the apostles' sermons so it's pretty hard to conclude that they didn't preach expository sermons. What we DO know is that Paul and others expected that the things they wrote (which became NT scriptures) would be read to the churches.

Tim Secrist

commented on Aug 7, 2013

There are basically six types of sermon forms: Expository, topical, inductive, deductive, narrative and first person. All of these are valid forms and, with some work, can be very effective and still be true to the text. Typically, the text should give us some insight as to which form can best explain the text. The Bible is filled with many examples of all of these sermons, from Genesis to Revelation. Don't be stuck in one or two forms. Experiment; get some good books; take some classes; listen to other preachers. Then discover how you can use all forms of preaching to the delight and the teaching of your congregation.

Keith Kelly

commented on Aug 11, 2013

I prefer expository preaching that is biblically accurate and righly divided. For instances, your article seems to support the ideal of women pastoring men...While this may be politically correct; it is clearly not the order that God has laid down for his Church. Don't mean to be argumentative-but someone needs to say it!

Join the discussion