Summary: A look at the real agenda of the "Open and Affirming" movement.
Since the Church has been commissioned by Jesus to love people and to reach out to others, how can Believers respond to these commands in a post-Christian, post-modern world? Does the answer lie in becoming an “Open and Affirming” church?
Many churches that are “Open and Affirming” see themselves as a place that, “where ever one is on their journey of faith, they are welcome”. They see themselves as a church where people can face tomorrow in the power of God’s love by becoming a diverse and inclusive congregation – multiracial, multigenerational, multicultural – offering a warm non-threatening environment to all. They believe that by being “Open and Affirming” they show a willingness to offer membership to everyone who could profit from belonging because they are willing to tackle the tough issues of the day with moral passion and genuine tolerance.
Churches that are not “Open and Affirming” have, in their view, adopted a sectarian mentality that insulates themselves from the culture and causes the burning of bridges that connect the church with the unchurched.
On the surface that seems reasonable. The Kingdom of God does include all of God’s children. Jesus did come to seek out the least, the last, and the lost. Jesus did associate with the prostitute, tax collector, and the leper. He accepted the individual for who they are, yet not condoning what they do. However, the real meaning behind “Open and Affirming” is becoming a church that accepts not only the individual, but specifically, their sexual behavior and lifestyle.
No one should ever discriminate against anyone because of their age, beliefs, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation. A true “Open and Affirming” church is one that should openly welcome all people and affirm their individual dignity and legal rights. More importantly, Christians are to treat one another as brothers and sisters first and foremost. All Believers are one family united by Jesus’ shed blood. (Gal 3:28-29)
The Authority Of Scripture
Based upon the authority of the Old and New Testaments it is very clear that normal sexual behavior is that which functions according to its design. The Biblical record shows that sexual union was established exclusively within the context of male-female relationship and formalized in the ordinance of marriage. The natural order of Creation dictates procreation. Genesis clearly states that God created man as male and female, to be joined together as a reflection of God’s love and relationship to His bride, the Church universal. Because God’s character and nature is love He would never create someone opposed to the design of His natural order and then say it is wrong to be like that.
In the New Testament, the oneness of male and female in marriage pictures the relationship between Christ and His Church and every Believer is to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman, or chastity in singleness. If you examine historical Christian tradition beginning from the first century and on through the ages you will see that the moral teaching tradition of the Christian church has declared any other behavior to be contrary to the will of God.