Summary: Part Two: deals with the fear of Ephraim and Manasseh when confronted with chariots of iron during their conquest of Canaan with applications to the Christian’s life.
A Bible Study by
Charles W. Holt
CHALLENGED BY CHARIOTS OF IRON(Part 2 of 3)
A little background on the tribes of Ephraim and Manesseh will be helpful in our understanding why the challenge to face chariots of iron was so important to them and, by extension, to us. These are the two sons of Joseph, born to him after he was elevated to a position second only in authority to the Pharaoh in Egypt (Gen. 46:20) In the Book of Joshua, these names identify the two families or "tribes" they have become, now numbering hundreds in teach group. It is the tribal leaders or elders who confront Joshua with their problem of possessing their promised inheritance (Joshua 17:14-18 (quickview) ), and provides us with the picture and principles we are using about our confrontation with chariots of iron.
A good question to test one’s Bible knowledge is: why not say, "Manasseh and Ephraim instead of Ephraim and Manasseh?" Is anything wrong with the order of these words? Does it matter? We will find that it does matter and we will discover the reason why later. The way we order words and phrases often indicate their importance. We usually put the most important things at the top of the list. Things of less concern are reserved for a place well down the list. Is this true in the Ephraim/Manasseh equation? You should know that family life as described in the Old Testament was shaped along highly structured hierarchical lines. The rule or privilege of the firstborn was strictly observed. The firstborn had not only an exalted position within the family unit but also privilege and power that could, and often did, extend beyond the family. Such a place of privilege carried the burden of great expectation. The potential and possibilities for leadership were enormous.
What does this have to do with chariots of iron? The answer is bound up in the principle of, "For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more" (Lk. 12:48). Let’s shine the light of this principle upon Ephraim’s and Manasseh’s reaction when they first encounter chariots of iron.
I believe Joshua was shocked at the reaction of these two when they complained that the job of taking possession of their allotted territory was made impossible by the fact that the Canaanites had chariots of iron in their arsenal. He listened to their whining complaint but his answer cut them no slack. Recall these words:
AND JOSHUA SPOKE TO THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH—EPHRAIM AND MANASSEH
Let’s take a close look at this snippet of a sentence. Three things need to be said here.
1. Joshua spoke.
2. Joshua spoke to the house of Joseph
3. Joshua spoke to Ephraim and Manasseh
Joshua Spoke – No one could speak with more authority to the Ephraim and Manasseh dynasties than Joshua. Not only had he been appointed by God as successor of Moses to lead the Israelites across the Jordan into the Promised Land—he was one of them. He was a blood brother. He belonged to the clan of Ephraim. He was not an outsider with Ephraim and Manasseh. He was bone of their bone, flesh of their flesh. This gave him clout. You listen to one of your own.