Summary: Nebuchadnezzar was a smart enough man to demand objective proof of revelation from God, and Daniel was the man through whom God produced it.

King Nebuchadnezzar was wise in taking a stand that was fool

proof on getting a true interpretation of his dream. He demanded of

the interpreter that he also produced the dream. Too many people in

history have been gullible and they have accepted the lies of men for

the leading of the Spirit. Some objective test like he required is just

about the only protection there is against subjective revelations that

lead to dead ends. Many who have such revelations are sincere, and

they are anxious to be led of God. Like the woman in the nursing

home who felt it was the leading of God to not take any of the

medicine the nurse tried to give her. Her condition worsened, and

then she thought the Lord let her down. She had a purely subjective

experience, but she was sincerely wrong. We need to beware of

taking subjective revelation too seriously.

Gideon is the man to follow when it comes to personal

revelations. He tested the spirit to see if it was truly from God. He

was skeptical and cautious to the point where he even feared that

God might be angry with him. When God promised him he would

deliver Israel by his hand Gideon was not satisfied until he had

objective evidence. He heard the voice, but he did not want to take

any chances. He put out a piece of fleece asking that God would give

him objective proof of his revelation by filling the fleece with dew

while all the rest of the ground remained dry. When he woke in the

morning he wrung enough dew from the fleece to fill a bowl while the

rest of the ground was dry. Even one miracle was not enough, and so

he asked the Lord to reverse the process so he could be sure this was

not just an amazing coincidence. When this was also fulfilled he was

confident that the Lord had spoken, and so he marched in obedience.

Those who do not test and see if the message is truly from God

caused great grief for themselves and others. Joanna Southcott, for

example, heard voices and started a movement and gained a

following he England, Ireland and America. In 1794 the voice

revealed to her that she was the bride of Christ spoken of in the book

of Revelation. Later when she was 64 years old she said it was

revealed that she was to give birth to the Messiah. Her followers

were greatly excited when she actually showed signs of pregnancy.

When the time passed and she did not give birth she became ill and

was confined to bed. She confessed, "It all appears a delusion." She

died apparently of a broken heart. She sincerely believed she had

revelations from God. Had she been more objective she never would

have allowed herself to be so deceived. Her movement continued and

it led to British-Israelism, which has a large body of strange

interpretations of the Bible.

Nebuchadnezzar was a smart enough man to demand objective

proof of revelation from God, and Daniel was the man through

whom God produced it. Notice how Daniel keeps himself out of the

picture and gives all the glory to God. Daniel is concerned lest the

king think that human wisdom had anything to do with this. No wise

man could ever have fulfilled the kings demand, but he says in verse

28 that there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and that he

has chosen to reveal to the king what will be in the latter days. The

Pulpit Commentary says, "No nation in ancient times was so addicted

to the study of the stars of heaven and to the future as were

the Chaldeans." They looked to the heavens for guidance, but Daniel

now calls the kings attention to the real source of all wisdom, which

is the one true God of heaven who made the stars and all that is in

the heavens.

J. A. Montgomery wrote, "That there is a God in heaven, as

against man-made gods and deified men, is the supreme theme of the

book, even as it is the cardinal principle of the Bible." Daniel here is

being the strongest possible witness to the true God. If he can

convince the king that Jehovah is the true God he will have

accomplished a great service for the world. We see in the boldness of

Daniel what each of us needs to be in order to have an adequate

witness for Christ. That which made Daniel the great witness he was

is the same thing that made Peter speak boldly before the Jews. The

difference between a weak and a bold witness is found in a personal

encounter with God. Daniel was brave and confident because he had

just had a marvelous spiritual experience, and Peter was likewise

bold because he had just had a personal encounter with the Living

Christ. A man is bold when he is sure of his message, and certain of

his relationship to God.

A weak witness is evidence of a lack of constantly growing in the

knowledge of God, when we slow up and ease off onto a plateau of

mediocre spiritual experience, then we cease to witness, for we have

no dynamic power to make us effective. We are like a salesman who

has lost interest in his product and who doesn't use it any longer

himself. He cannot get very excited about anyone else using it. A

good witness, like a good salesman, has to be sold on his product and

excited about others discovering its value. Daniel was excited about

the God of heaven and he wanted to point the king to Him. When we

are excited about Christ and what He has done for us, and what He

can do for others, we will have no trouble finding ways to witness.

Before Daniel conveyed to the king the dream and its

interpretation he made sure that God would receive the glory.

Before we look at the dream we want to consider what Daniel

stresses here, and how God was concerned that the king know the

meaning of the dream. That alone accounts for his being able to

interpret it and not any unique wisdom of his own. The question is:

Why would God give such a revelation to a pagan who was not

among his own people, and who did not even believe in Him? We

know God spoke to Cornelius in the New Testament, but he was at

least a very devout believer in the one true God, though he did not

know Christ. Nebuchadnezzar was not in the category of Cornelius

at all. He was an oriental tyrant with the typical cruelty of such men.

He had Zedekiah the king of Judah blinded after he was made to

witness the execution of his sons. (II Kings 25:7). In this very

chapter we have seen his anger, which was willing to kill every wise

man in Babylon because they could not tell him his dream. And yet

God gave him a special revelation about the future.

What this teaches us is that we ought to be aware of the

superficial view that limits the actions of God to his own people. God

can and does work with an through and for those who are

unbelievers. We cannot an dare not confine God in our thinking, for

to do so does not limit God, but it does limit our own recognition of

the sovereignty of God in the world. God does not leave himself

without a witness anywhere, and we cannot doubt that, for in the

most unlikely places, and by the most unlikely means, God is

working in the world.

I read Bertrand Russell's book Why I Am Not A Christian. It is

a book by an atheist that can be used of God to enlighten His

children. It is valuable to see what the Christian life looks like

through the eyes of a non-believer. It reveals how blind they can be

to the essence of Christianity, but it also reveals legitimate areas of

failure, which ought to be corrected if we expect to communicate the

truth of God to the world. If we really believe in a sovereign God

who is working in history, then we need to act like it and seek to find

values for a life of service and praise out of all the negatives as well

as the positives. God gave His people messages through pagan kings,

and God is still a God of history today working through leaders of

non-Christian nations.

Luther credited the devil with being one of his best teachers to

make him a worthy minister. Samson found his honey in the carcass

of a lion, and Luther found sweet lessons in the roaring lion of Satan.

He wrote, "I did not learn to preach all at once. It was my

temptation and my corruption that best prepared me for the pulpit.

The devil has been my best professor of exegetical and experimental

divinity. Before this great schoolmaster took me in hand, I was a

sucking child and not a grown man. It was my combats with sin and

with Satan that made me a true minister of the New Testament."

The point is, don't even waste the devil's roar in your life. God

works in all things for good with those who love Him and who are

called according to His purpose.