Summary: All behaviours are not acceptable in the Church.
Get Rid of the Leaven!
March 17, 2001
The Globe and Mail has been running some rather controversial and attention grabbing advertisements of late. In one that I hear on the radio, the idea is that a CEO is promoting someone to a vice-presidency, I believe, and states: “Jones is over 6 feet tall, has all sorts of great virtues, always keeps his friends close and enemies closer, and knows all the company secrets. I’ll be watching you, buddy.” And the line then is, “The truth is not always this clear. Read the Globe and Mail to get up-to-date information.
I’ve seen their similar ads on television a couple of times and they’re equally attention grabbing. The ads show a number of shots of people’s heads and they’re making straightforward statements. “I believe abortion should be illegal.” “Capital punishment should be brought back.” And other similar statements are made. Again, the line is, “The truth is not always this clear. Read the Globe and Mail.”
What catches me, in the statements on television, in particular, is that the ideas spoken are not generally accepted ideas anymore. In fact, I believe there would be a lot of intolerance toward the ideas that are used to catch attention, which is what the ads are supposed to do. So, I imagine people have done some reading of the Globe in response to the ads. There, they’re meant to get all the true stories that will allow them to make informed decisions about what is right and wrong in any story.
Tolerance is a difficult subject- it was the Corinthian Christians and it is for us, too. What is tolerance? What is too much tolerance? Can Christians be too tolerant? What kind of result comes from being too tolerant? Is it a good result? Or is it a bad result?
Let’s meet the apostle Paul as he worked with the Corinthian Christians on this important subject. The exact situation might not apply to us, but the principles do, and we can take those principles to other areas of our lives, including our church life.
The presenting situation is bizarre, to say the least.
1 Cor. 5. 1, 2- here you have a believer Christian who has entered a sexual relationship with his stepmother, who is, obviously a non-believer or non-Christian. (How do we know or surmise that? Who can tell us?) Wow! People will do incredible things, but this really mucks up a family situation. The idea of sexual relationships with the same person a father is with is really incredible!
Paul wasn’t impressed by their reaction, and he goes on to explain what they should have considered but didn’t. They let their hearts rule their heads on this one. They allowed the idea of their ‘freedom’ to extend much too far!
v. 3, 4, 5- Paul comes across clearly, exercising the leadership that was incumbent upon him. I can guess that he got a lot of criticism about this. I can imagine that a lot of people ‘didn’t agree with Paul.’ I, also, have an idea that this didn’t bother Paul very much.
He, remember, kept pointing back to Him- to God- from whom all identity and absolutes came. He was the one who emphasized the reality that everything we have came from Him. He’s the one who spoke, clearly, of the stewardship responsibility we/they have in all areas of life. He stood very strongly and clearly in matters having to do with God!