Summary: Someone suggested that we return to radical Christianity. I’m for it but are we up to the demands?

  Study Tools
  Study Tools

There is a group on one of the social networks that was issuing a call to return to radical Christianity. I love the concept and joined the group but I wanted to feel out how they defined radical and if they were really up to radical Christianity thus I posted this in the group’s discussion area.

Are you suggesting we dump all the fad, flash and fleshly foolishness of the seeker churches and get back to 1st Century Christianity?

Yes, many of the mainline Churches have fallen away into apostasy but today’s entertainment arcades called churches are not radical Christianity but rather effeminate weak-kneed places where cheer leaders and motivational speakers man the pulpits doing religious non-speak for fear of offending the crowd or even the World with the truth. They should be called Houses of Scratch for the itching ears, not churches that are supposed to be the pillar and ground of truth.

There is no need for evangelical rosaries or programs of purpose in true radical Christianity. Matthew 28:18-20 and Ephesians 4:11-16 give the purpose of the saint and church. That is all the 1st Century martyrs needed. Repetition of one man’s prayer will gain no more than any other mantra with the God who commands it not to be done.

Prosperity? Funny, the apostles did not live in multi-million dollar homes or have marble toilets. Most of them died in relative poverty by worldly standards but died with greater wealth than Buffet and Gates could ever conceive. Did they need to meet in Taj Mahals fully equipped with huge screens and awesome sound systems? Nay, I say Paul’s and Silas’ A Capella song in prison or of the songs of those on their way to be fed to lions and as they burned at stakes make our praise and worship songs off key and out of rhythm with the symphony that the Master is conducting.

Radical Christianity? None in the so-called first world nations have half a clue about what constitutes mundane Christianity let alone radical Christianity. Hear the songs from the prisons overseas where our brethren languish physically but are robust in true spiritual health. Hear their blood call out from their graves wondering when we will get off our sanctimonious sacroiliacs and sell out completely to the true and living God who died for us. We play Church and they live Christ.

They pray for souls and to live another day to serve while we pray for bigger paychecks and stuff but seldom witness though we sang for an hour on Sunday about how great is our God. We sing, "Word of God speak" and then gag Him if He gets too doctrinal or makes the wrong demands upon our life. We are sickly, sallow, sated saints while our brethren who often only have one meal a day are strong soldiers serving saturated in their own blood receiving more than the blessings we crave and cannot receive.

No one wants really radical Christianity in the citadels of civilization. Radical Christianity would be uncultured and crude making itself unwelcome on TV shows where those who would be princes cannot tell a lost man that he is lost and so are all who do not receive Christ as Saviour. How can radical Christianity possibly exist in places where Christians bow the knee and kiss the feet of the culture to accept us by catering to their political correctness and their standards of what makes a successful church or pastor?

Download Sermon With PRO View On One Page With PRO
Browse All Media

Related Media

A Workman Approved
PowerPoint Template
PowerPoint Template
Abide In Christ
PowerPoint Template
Talk about it...

Harold Hansen

commented on Feb 8, 2009


Rob Strong

commented on Mar 13, 2009

I am so discouraged by this kind of sermon. When one has to use "put-downs" as a means to make a point, we call that insecurity. I don''t know you Ronald, but you don''t need to criticize other churches ... especially when you speak in worst-case generalizations. I learned early in my preaching that you don''t need to tear others down to make your point, rather, paint a picture of what is possible. By the way, when you criticize large churches for all their equipment and electronics and bells and whistles, that is almost always an argument of jealousy. If you were truly not in favor of technology, you wouldn''t have a website like you do with all the bells and whistles and links sending people to other like-minded websites. You don''t need to be pursuing the tearing down of brothers and sisters. You just don''t need to do that.

Dr. Ronald Shultz

commented on Nov 4, 2013

Friend, as they say in the old days, "if the shoe fits wear it." If not, put it back on the shelf and grab another pair. You have not been where I have been or seen what I have seen not have I done the same for you. If all you have seen are peachy keen situations I am glad for you. I am not at all jealous. I wish we had Acts 2 conversions on a daily basis, but the proof is in the pudding. If we were really producing as many solid Christians as we report this culture would be in a far better shape than it is. Take away the music, coffee and whatever other, for want of a better word, carnal attractions and see how large it remains. Do a Jesus turnaround and start preaching strong doctrine and see if you have to ask your staff if they are going to leave as well. Where people are dying for their faith they have none of these things we feel we need to worship and yet their faith is strong and the church is growing with the same type of believers. I never said I was not in favor of technology. But when technology becomes the drawing card instead of the Word then it is out of balance. If you sing for 90 minutes and preach 15-20 you are out of balance. If classes on finance and job success are better attended than ones on holiness and prayer then the focus is off. Jist sayin'.

David Littrell

commented on Aug 14, 2009

Refreshingly candid and all too true. As Rob Strong''s post below proves, it hits close to home and causes the convicted to whine. This is not "tearing down brothers and sisters", it is a clarion wake up call to those who have been feeding the flesh and having their itching ears scratched. All too often, as I believe the case is here, people will feign concern in an attempt to mask their unbiblical criticism. They berate sound preaching and resort to the weak, psycho-babble analysis of subjective things like insecurity and jealously instead of the truth of the Word of God. They really need to stop pursuing the building up of their flesh and say "AMEN" to those who preach the truth! But can those in a Laodiciean age church handle the truth? That’s a good question.

Join the discussion