Sermon Central
-
The Science Of The 21st Century Redeems With The Bible? Series
Contributed by Alexandre Choi on Aug 31, 2012 (message contributor)
Summary: Recently, Hawking wrote in his book "The Grand Design" that there was no place for God in the creation of the universe. And some, congratulating the book, complete: the preachers are swindlers, because they sell what does not exist. Are we or not? How to
It’s not Cosmovision.
Because Cosmovisions are human construction while the Planck’s Natural Units are “… necessarily retain their meaning for all times and for all civilizations, even extraterrestrial and non-human ones …” (1899, wikipedia)
They are not human construct or conventional.
Physicists don’t interpret them correctly. The reason is they define units to usual construct only, as social constructs. “In physical sciences, numerical values (such as constants, quantities, or scales of measurement) are called conventional if they do not represent a measured property of nature, but originate in a convention, for example an average of many measurements, agreed between the scientists working with these values.” (wikipedia) And “Social constructs are generally understood to be the by-products of countless human choices rather than laws resulting from divine will or nature.” (wikipedia)
Planck’s Natural Units are used as “Dimensional Analysis” and “to simplifying equations” at the same time, but are fundamentally “Laws of Universe”, namely, “The Algorithm of the Universe”, meaning that the law itself already contains algorithms to create the Universe: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.” (Hawking, 2010)
It is the “M-Theory”, what claim “…without a single equation”.
The question, with this point, becomes the diversity of the Cosmovisions to the number of equations.
But Hawking is wrong.
Again.
Maybe he is hiding again or diverting attention again back to the other direction: “One can’t prove that God doesn’t exist, but science makes God unnecessary.”
The interest is God or not-God.
If the laws of nature are independents of human construction, so it’s understandable that he finds different ways of creating the universe without God.
To do this uses the name of science.
“In the name of Science, I command you: Come out, ignorance!”
Or
“In the name of Science, I command you: Come out, God!”
Where will God go?
To out of the universe!
To out of the Planck’s universe!
It visualizes the universe of Planck’s Cosmology!
"...not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ..." (Galatians 1:1)
"...Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit..." (Zachariah 4:9)
Do you have courage to preach it?
