Summary: In Titus 1:10–16, Paul first gives a general 1) description of false teachers in the church who are to be silenced (Titus 1:10–13a). He then specifies 2) What the reaction to those should be (Titus 1:13b–14) and 3) Evaluates their lives (Titus 1:15–16).
The publishing world sees very few books reach blockbuster status, but William Paul Young’s The Shack has now exceeded even that. The book, originally self-published by Young and two friends, has now sold more than 10 million copies and has been translated into over thirty languages. It is now one of the best-selling paperback books of all time, soon to be released as a major motion picture…. In the shack, “Mack” meets the divine Trinity as “Papa,” an African-American woman; Jesus, a Jewish carpenter; and “Sarayu,” an Asian woman who is revealed to be the Holy Spirit. The book is mainly a series of dialogues between Mack, Papa, Jesus, and Sarayu. Those conversations reveal God to be very different than the God of the Bible. “Papa” is absolutely non-judgmental, and seems most determined to affirm that all humanity is already redeemed. Although misrepresenting the person of the Godhead and state of humanity, many people, even many professed Christians, seem to be captivated. The answer is not to ban The Shack or yank it out of the hands of readers. We need not fear books — we must be ready to answer them. We desperately need a theological recovery that can only come from practicing biblical discernment. This will require us to identify the doctrinal dangers of The Shack, to be sure. But our real task is to reacquaint evangelicals with the Bible’s teachings on these very questions and to foster a doctrinal rearmament of Christian believers. (http://www.albertmohler.com/2017/03/06/shack-missing-art-evangelical-discernment/)
One of Titus’s major responsibilities in overseeing the churches on Crete was to prepare them to counteract the false teaching and immoral living of certain leaders. Paul charged Titus, and through him the churches, not simply to correct their false doctrine and denounce their immoral behavior but to silence them and remove such spiritual cancers from the fellowships. It is the task of the church, and especially of its godly leaders, to silence those who associate with the Body of Christ in an effort to pervert God’s truth and confuse and corrupt His people. Paul warned Timothy that: “Evil men and impostors will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived,” (2 Tim. 3:13). But, like Timothy, faithful pastors and elders have standing orders to “guard what has been entrusted to [them], avoiding worldly and empty chatter and the opposing arguments of what is falsely called ‘knowledge’ ” (1 Tim. 6:20).
It has been said that we live in an age of tolerance. Some argue that people should be free to say what they want, how they want, were they want and when they want. The danger in the absolute freedom to do so should be obvious. We have standards in education to ensure what is taught corresponds to facts. Libel and slander laws prevent the sharing of false information as to not damage a company or person. Public safety laws prevent someone shouting “fire” in a crowded theatre so as to not cause undue panic. Through the courts, publications and common discourse, safeguards exist in order to examine, challenge and prevent the inaccurate or even dangerous spread of misinformation.