Summary: This sermon illustrates that those involved in adultery will always destroy many things in their lives.
The Wayfaring Man
2 Samuel 12:1-6 And the LORD sent Nathan unto David. And he came unto him, and said unto him, There were two men in one city; the one rich, and the other poor. 2 The rich man had exceeding many flocks and herds: 3 But the poor man had nothing, save one little ewe lamb, which he had bought and nourished up: and it grew up together with him, and with his children; it did eat of his own meat, and drank of his own cup, and lay in his bosom, and was unto him as a daughter. 4 And there came a traveler unto the rich man, and he spared to take of his own flock and of his own herd, to dress for the wayfaring man that was come unto him; but took the poor man’s lamb, and dressed it for the man that was come to him. 5 And David’s anger was greatly kindled against the man; and he said to Nathan, As the LORD liveth, the man that hath done this thing shall surely die: 6 And he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing, and because he had no pity.
l. THE PARABLE OF THE LITTLE LAMB
A. The Comparisons
-What an incredible story that the prophet Nathan tells to David the king. What a drama that is played out in the king’s court on that fateful day. It had the makings of a blockbuster. It probably would have won an award, but this whole tale was not fiction, it was real. A year had now passed since this story had been accomplished.
• Two Men in One City.
• A Rich Man.
• A Poor Man.
• The Rich Man had exceeding flocks and herds.
• The Poor Man had nothing, except for one little ewe lamb.
• The Rich Man took the poor man’s lamb and spared his own flock.
-There is no other parable in the Old Testament that can be compared with this one. None equals the story of the little single lamb. Nathan uses such mastery and such skill in telling the story that all who hear it are cast under the spell of this tale.
-These two men in the parable, because of the geographical considerations, were in equality. Two men in one city bound by the citizenship of a nation that God had his hand on. But the comparisons pretty much stop there.
B. The Contrasts of This Parable
-The rich man had enough wealth to cover any need that he had. There was no desire that could be left unattended. There was no purpose that he could not carry out. Whatever he desired in this life, he generally either bought it or took it, whatever suited the situation.
-The poor man was confined by his limitations. He found himself at the mercy of those above him socially and materially.
-The rich man’s position made it possible for him to indulge in his lawlessness without any hindrance at all. The poor man found his own happiness and his life at the disposal of the rich man’s desires. Once the crime was accomplished, this inequality aggravated and exacerbated the crime of the rich man.
-That is the whole jest of the story. But behind each of these characters lies a vast territory of discovery. This parable not only tells us of men then and how they operate, but it tells us of the here and now and how men operate. Even more importantly it tells us of and brings discovery to our own lives.