Summary: Essentially, the questioner is asking, “Is there any way that the God who can make all things can make a rock so big that the God who can lift all things cannot lift it?” Worded this way, the inconsistency and meaningless nature of the question is reveale
Can God Make a Rock So Big He Can’t Lift It?
by Alex McFarland
I had just finished speaking at the Spirit West Coast festival and was enjoying the sunny California weather when I noticed a group of teens huddled together, whispering to one another.
Curious, I watched while a boy of about 16 sauntered toward me with a smirk on his face. He flashed a quick grin in the direction of his friends, thinking he had caught both me and God
in some kind of cosmic checkmate. He asked, “Can God make a rock so big that He can’t lift it?”
The challenge inherent in this question is whether there’s something God cannot do. I’ve found that nonbelievers enjoy asking us this question, because either way we respond we submit that there is, in fact, something God cannot accomplish. Either we answer that God can make a big rock He cannot lift or that God cannot make a rock big enough that He can’t lift it. A seemingly insolvable conundrum. However, God is not put in checkmate at all. In fact, this problem in no way proves there’s something God cannot do. It simply asks a meaningless question that contradicts itself in many ways.
Essentially, the questioner is asking, “Is there any way that the God who can make all things can make a rock so big that the God who can lift all things cannot lift it?” Worded this way, the inconsistency and meaningless nature of the question is revealed. It’s actually a pseudo-question. It makes no sense. The question itself has no truth value in order to be evaluated as either true or false. It proposes impossible conditions that can never be met.
Trying to answer this question is much like trying to answer “What does the color blue smell like?” or telling someone to think about two boys, each shorter than the other. These types of sentences are called “self-defeating statements,” or “self-contradictory.” Fascination or even obsession with the “big rock” question really says more about the skeptic than about the truth or possible falsity of Christianity. Because such meaningless questions or statements in no way endanger the truth and know-ability of the Biblical world-view, there is no need to be afraid of them. Here are a few other such intriguing (yet benign) word conundrums (think about them):
“Ask me about my vow of silence.”
“Words don’t mean things.”
“I cannot utter a word of English.”
“There are no sentences longer than 3 words.”
“I’ve had amnesia for as long as I can remember”
And perhaps the most widely accepted self-contradictory assessment of our times…
“There is no such thing as absolute truth,” or, “Truth can’t be known.”
Think about these things. Really, reflect on the statements above. These types of statements are all self-contradictory, yet many in our culture today have no problem with comfortable acceptance of meaningless positions.
The “big rock” question reveals false assumptions about the biblical concept of omnipotence. Omnipotence does not mean God has the power to do anything at all; it is the power to do anything consistent with His character and who He is. The question is not really one of power as much as it is of logic and consistency. God cannot do something that is logically contradictory or contrary to His nature. For example, He cannot lie or sin or learn anything new. Those things that are true about His character will always be true, and He cannot do anything to contradict them.