Improve your sermon prep with our brand new study tools! Learn all about them here.
Sermons

Summary: Evolution Series--all sermons on website w/ Downloadable Powerpoints.

  Study Tools

Devilution: Erosion of Mankind, PT. 4

Conclusion of “Fairy Tale for Adults”

II Cor. 5:17

3 Reasons to reject evolution:

Logical/Moral/Spiritual

3 bridges no evolutionist can cross:

Origin of life/fixity of species/2nd law of thermodynamics

Last time we dealt w/ the logical/moral reasons…racism, Nazism, communism, humanism, sexual revolution…I appealed to your mind.

We looked at Darwin, and how his book, Origin of Species, led to the worst morals the world has ever known, and still does today!

Tonite we continue and I want to appeal to your heart!

Spiritual/Theological Reasons

Evolution is the direct opposite of what the Word of God teaches.

Historian H.G. Wells said, “if all animals and man evolved, then there were no first parents, no paradise, no fall. And if there was no fall, then the entire historic fabric of Christianity, the story of the first sin, the reason for the atonement, collapses like a house of cards.”

Rom. 5 talks about the last Adam, Jesus Christ. Why is he the last Adam? Because “as in Adam all die, in Christ shall all be made alive.”

Dishonesty and Deceit of many evolutionists, practicing “Weird Science!”

It is not science, but is in fact a religious, philosophical belief that uses scientific terminology and methods to try to prove that belief.

FOUR BASIC INGREDIENTS OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD:

1. OBSERVATION: One must be able to observe that which is object of investigation.

2. HYPOTHESIS: One formulates a hypothesis and then sets out to verify that hypothesis through testing.

3. TESTING: This is how one’s hypothesis is either verified or discredited, it must be tested in a controlled environment.

4. REPEATABLE RESULTS: To prove your hypothesis is true, you must be able to repeat the results in a controlled environment, so those results can be observed, measured and recorded.

NOTE: The thing I want you see is that the theory of evolution does not pass three of the four basic ingredients of the “Scientific Method.”

Can evolution be observed?......Answer: “NO!” (“Were you there?”)

Can evolution be tested?.......Answer: “NO!” (You can not test evolution.)

Can evolution be proven by repeatable results....Answer: “NO!” (You obviously can’t repeat what you can not even produce the first time.)

The point is: evolution is a philosophy or a religion, not a pure science.

You see the truth is, evolutionists do not begin with the evidence and then move toward a conclusion.... They begin with a conclusion and then look for evidence to support the conclusion, and all too often they are even willing to twist and distort the facts related to the evidence to make it fit their pre-existing conclusion.

Ex. Some evolutionists have even been so hard pressed to find evidence to support their predisposed bias and belief system, that they have been perfectly willing to actually fabricate false evidence to prove their already existing conclusions.

What about Nebraska man?

Scopes/Monkey trial of 1925, they were arguing whether evolution should be taught in the public schools. The highlight of the trial was when the lawyers actually put each other on the stand and went at each other.


Talk about it...

Nobody has commented yet. Be the first!

Join the discussion