Summary: We often let ’cultural Christianity’ override the truth of God’s grace in our relationships

There’s a story about a mother who handed her six-year-old son two candy balls, and told him to share with his four year old brother. She said, “He may spit it out, because they’re kind of sour tasting. But if he keeps sucking on it, there’s bubble gum in the middle”. The older boy ran outside to find his little brother. As the mother watched out the kitchen window, the four-year-old put his piece of candy in his mouth. His big brother watched in obvious suspense while the four-year-old’s face began to screw up with the bitter taste. As he slowly began to drool out the corner of his mouth and raise his hand to his face, palm up, his older brother yelled, “Don’t spit yet!”

In Acts chapter 10, God gives Peter a lesson in preparation for ministering to a group of people that Peter has always considered, well, unpalatable.

On the surface we read this passage as relating to the division between Jew and Gentile, and we rejoice that through Christ the dividing wall has been torn down. But there is much more to this scripture account, and some of that much more involves a sometimes bitter lesson for us.

(Read Acts 10:9-16)

As we read the chapter, we see Peter making application of this vision, in verse 28:

“And he said to them, “You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit him; and yet God has shown me that I should not call any man unholy or unclean”.”

Now I want to follow the steps of Peter in the learning process, and we’ll see some lessons for ourselves as we go along.

If you look at Mark 7, you’ll see something that has a close connection with the attitude we see expressed by Peter in Acts 10.

The Pharisees had just criticized Jesus for allowing His disciples to eat without performing the ritualistic hand washing ceremony that their traditions called for. So Jesus has entered upon a discourse to correct their error, and when He is done, having left the area, His disciples ask Him in private what He meant by the things He said.

So I start reading from verse 18 of Mark 7

“And He said to them, ‘Are you so lacking in understanding also? Do you not understand that whatever goes into the man from outside cannot defile him; because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?’ (Thus He declared all foods clean) And He was saying, ‘That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man.’”

Now note that He was speaking privately to His disciples here, including Peter, and He was saying things that apparently, in their hearing, was tantamount to a declaration that all foods are clean and ok to eat. We know, because the gospel writer includes that statement in the text: “Thus He declared all foods clean”. Interestingly, it is commonly accepted that Peter was probably the one dictating this gospel to John Mark as his scribe.

Now if you’ll turn just for a moment to Matthew 15:15, you’ll see this same discourse recorded, but Matthew actually names Peter as the one who specifically asked for clarification of the parable.

So there can be no supportable argument made for Peter’s ignorance about Jesus declaring all foods clean during His earthly ministry. We don’t know how many times He may have touched on this subject; not everything Jesus said and did is recorded for us. But we know he said it this once, and we know that it was in Peter’s presence.

Yet here in Acts 10, we find a post-crucifixion and resurrection Peter, now filled with the Holy Spirit, having to learn the lesson anew.

Let’s begin by discussing this propensity we all seem to have, for talking back to the Lord.

In one of C.H. Spurgeon’s sermons, he talked about what contrary creatures we are. In our speech, he says, there is, “ mixed with unbelief, love defaced with a want (lack of) submission, gratitude combined with mistrust, humility flavored with self-conceit, courage undermined with cowardice, fervor mingled with indifference.”

Now, here in verse 10 of Acts 10, we see this trait in Peter. “No Lord...”

If we’re going to say ‘no’ to His commands, then why call Him ‘Lord’? If we are humble enough to know and to accept that He is our Lord, then ‘no’ should never be considered an acceptable response to His commands!

Copy Sermon to Clipboard with PRO Download Sermon with PRO
Browse All Media

Related Media

Talk about it...

Nobody has commented yet. Be the first!

Join the discussion