Summary: God treats sinners like us the same way he treated the vile King Ahab - with patience and mercy.

  Study Tools

Of all the villains in the Star Wars movies, who is the most infamous? Darth Maul? Count Dooku? General Grievous? No. Darth Vader is the most notorious villain of them all. Even those who have never seen Star Wars before know that Darth Vader is a bad guy.

Who’s been the most recognizable villain in (our sermon series) Seer Wars? That would be King Ahab. The author of 1 Kings said of him: “There was never a man like Ahab, who sold himself to do evil in the eyes of the LORD, urged on by Jezebel his wife. 26 He behaved in the vilest manner by going after idols, like the Amorites the LORD drove out before Israel” (1 Kings 21:25, 26). Just as many love to hate Darth Vader, it’s easy to hate King Ahab. Yet that’s not what God thought of Ahab. That’s good news because the way God treated the vile King Ahab in Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back is the way he treats all sinners, including us. Let’s find out what that treatment is.

In the movie version of Episode V, Darth Vader is busy seeking out and destroying rebel bases to consolidate the Empire’s evil hold on the galaxy. King Ahab too was interested in gaining more control of the land around him. He was especially interested in acquiring a vineyard next door to his summer palace in Jezreel and turning it into a vegetable garden. To his credit Ahab didn’t just take the vineyard but first asked its owner, Naboth, to sell the land or trade for it. Naboth, however, replied: “The LORD forbid that I should give you the inheritance of my fathers” (1 Kings 21:3). Naboth wasn’t exaggerating when he said, “The Lord forbid.” God had forbidden the Israelites from permanently selling their ancestral lands (Leviticus 25:23). There were no exceptions, not even for the king.

Ahab was not happy. The original language literally says that a storm raged in his heart for there was that name again, the LORD, making his life difficult. If it wasn’t that dreaded prophet Elijah telling him what the LORD said he could or could not do, then it was another one of his simpleton followers (Jeske).

Isn’t that what we think of God sometimes – as someone who gets in the way? If only we didn’t have God’s “arbitrary” rules to keep, like refraining from sex before marriage, then life would be so much more exciting! Although we may think that life without God’s rules would be more exciting, the opposite is true. Life without God’s laws is chaotic and painful. For example God knows that the excitement of illicit sex only leads to guilt and shame afterwards, not to mention the risk of some pretty serious diseases. Friends, be thankful when fellow Christians turn you away from a course of action that God tells us is wrong. If he says it’s wrong, he’s simply trying to protect us from harm.

Had King Ahab been more Darth Vader-like he would have personally strangled Naboth for his refusal to sell the vineyard. Instead Ahab went home and sulked. He probably would have eventually gotten over his anger but when his wife Jezebel found out why he was pouting, she chided him for not acting like a king - at least not like the kings where she came from. In Jezebel’s homeland of Sidon, kings took things they wanted and didn’t let anyone stand in their way. Jezebel would show Ahab how to act and promised to get him Naboth’s vineyard. She began by forging letters from Ahab directing the elders of Naboth’s city to call a fast signifying that someone in the city had done something wrong. When everyone was gathered at the fast, two scoundrels were to accuse Naboth of cursing God and king. They did this and immediately Naboth and his sons (cf. 2 Kings 9:26) were stoned to death with rocks. Naboth’s land was then deeded to the crown. The empire had struck back.

Browse All Media

Related Media

Reflection Supply
Outreach, Inc.
PowerPoint Template
Reflection Above
Outreach, Inc.
PowerPoint Template
Fresh Air Grass
Outreach, Inc.
PowerPoint Template
Talk about it...

Nobody has commented yet. Be the first!

Join the discussion