Summary: "The secret things belong to the Lord our God; but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law." ...
God answered Job out of the whirlwind: "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge." Job 38:1 - the beginning of our reading from today’s lectionary, that marks the beginning of the end of the book of Job.
We’ve been plowing our way through the book of Job for quite a few Sundays now without going near it during the sermon time. Perhaps the book itself, like the dark, shadowy monsters that it talks about, poses too much of a threat to us small-time preacher persons. Who are we to think that we can grapple with the mighty issues addressed in the book of Job, when all the people who do grapple with them in the book do such a dismal job of it, and when the wisest of them all - Job - is summed up as someone who ’darkens counsel by words without knowledge’?
And yet there’s something unavoidable about the book of Job, just as the fundamental question that the man addresses - ’why do the innocent suffer?’ is one that we religious people especially find ourselves inevitably returning to time and time again.
Job is a long book - 42 chapters in all - and it’s mainly composed of a series of speeches that come in cycles between Job and his three friends. They are structured along the lines of a traditional debate where Job and each of his friends speak in turn to put their case, and eventually an adjudicator comes in (by the name of Elihu) to sum up the debate. This is then followed by the appearance of another adjudicator who surprises everybody by appearing out of a whirlwind, and He offers some more authoritative perspectives of His own on the debate.
The topic of debate though is clear from the outset: ’why does God allow the innocent to suffer?’ This is Job’s question. It is also our question. It is perhaps the religious question.
I remember when I was at University, getting very excited about Christian missions taking place on the campus. We would have a variety of different speakers, sharing the gospel from a variety of different perspectives, but the first question that would be put to the speaker from the unbelieving audience would always be the same: ’why does God allow the innocent to suffer?’
Over my years of studying philosophy, the greatest intellectual challenge, in my view, put to persons of faith was that put by the ’Logical Positivists’ and their successors during the early part of the last century. They wanted to know whether, even in theory, there was any way of disproving the Christian faith. Just tell us, they asked, whether anything, even in theory, could show your beliefs to be false. And the answer that came back was, well, that the suffering of the innocent is something that seems to threaten to disprove what we believe about God!
Why do the innocent suffer? This is not just an intellectual question. It’s commonly a heartfelt emotional reaction we have when we’re trying to come to terms with another rank injustice.
A week ago I was listening to a man tell me about how his father was recently kicked to death by the border he had living in his house. Then the young assailant tried to hide the body in the closet and cover it with his clothes, so that it wasn’t found for ages. Why do these things happen?