Summary: Most Christians believe because their parents did and they have since birth. But what reason can we give to those who are not already convinced?
Why We Believe
What evidence can you present for your faith that Jesus Christ is son of God, lived on earth, died on cross, resurrected, saved us from sin, etc?
2. Preaching to eyewitnesses would be silly, if they knew better.
3. Disciples willingness to die a terrible death for the truth
Not willingly die for lie
4. Not enough time for legend to replace historical truth
eyewitnesses still alive
5. Accuracy of Isiaah. 53 where born
escape to Egypt
return to Nazareth
betrayed for specific amount
cast lots for clothes
6. Personal Appearances
12+ times to 515+ people
1 Cor. 15:6
8. Historical evidence outside the Bible
9. Personal Experience
The following notes are helpful
It comes from the internet and is not, I believe, protected
-- CONCERNING WRITING AND ACCURACY
The Dead Sea Scrolls which have proven that the Old Testament writings are indeed ancient and have maintained nearly perfect accuracy in transmission.
The tablets at Ebla are another discovery which have proven that writing existed far prior to Moses' era, contrary to earlier criticisms.
-- CONCERNING LOST KINGS AND CIVILIZATIONS
The Hitite civilization was once considered fictitious because it was only mentioned in the Bible. That is until 1906 when the German archaeologist Winckler discovered the Hitite's capital city along with their entire history recorded on cuneiform. Not only had the Bible been validated concerning the Hitites, but the cuneiform tablets gave an early history conforming to that described by the Bible. 5 Hititology eventually became a major in several universities.
The book of Daniel was once thought to be wrong in mentioning two concurrent kings of Babylon, neither of whom had been found anywhere else in history. Then in 1854, J.G. Taylor unearthed writings of the king, Nabonidus, and his son, Belshazzar, the crown prince. 6 Upon this discovery, Daniel's labeling of Belshazzar as king was still thought to be in error. But this too was clarified by a 1979 discovery of a statue in northern Syria which, in two languages, described Belshazzar's position.
The Assyrian text described him as governor, which was his official title, while the Aramaic described him as king, the role which he had been given over them. 7 This fine distinction in titles had been lost since Daniel's writings over 2,500 years ago as had also been lost detailed descriptions of the Babylonian Court and empire. 8 If not truly authored by Daniel, or someone of his time, who else would have included the so-called obvious mistake of two concurrent kings? Who else would have known accurate details of the ancient city - both of which had long remained lost until the twentieth century? J.D. Wilson reiterates,
-- CONCERNING LIFE AND CUSTOMS
Tablets of writing from Mari on the Middle Euphrates (c.1700-1600 BC) and Nuzi on the Tigris in northeastern Iraq, discovered in 1925, give corroborating accounts as to the life and customs recorded in the Bible. Henry T. Frank elaborates,