Improve your sermon prep with our brand new study tools! Learn all about them here.
Sermons

Summary: With the passing of Jerry Falwell and D. James Kennedy along with the dissolution of the Center for Reclaiming America and the Center for Christian Statesmanship, the issue has arisen once again as to whether or not conservative Evangelicals should partic

  Study Tools

With the passing of Jerry Falwell and D. James Kennedy along with the dissolution of the Center for Reclaiming America and the Center for Christian Statesmanship, the issue has arisen once again as to whether or not conservative Evangelicals should participate in political activity. Since things have not gotten any better and if anything continued their downward spiral since the advent of the contemporary conservative Evangelical movement popularly referred to as the "Religious Right", it has been suggested by some that politically interested Christians should be herded back into their pews to once again await the Apocalypse.

Interestingly, one of the foremost voices now opposed to conservative Evangelical political involvement is none other than columnist Cal Thomas, who at one time served as a Falwell underling as vice president of Moral Majority and spoke at Dr. Kennedy’s Reclaiming America for Christ conference. Thomas, in a column analyzing the passing of his former colleague titled "The Legacy of Jerry Falwell", concludes of the Religious Right, "The movement also had its downside, because it tended to detract from a Christian’s primary responsibility of telling people the ’good news’ that redemption comes only through Jesus Christ."

While there is a degree of truth to that as during the early to mid 90’s at times it seemed Falwell’s ministry did place too much emphasis hawking videotapes exposing the criminality of Bill Clinton and replaying week after week snippets of homosexual excesses to the point where one had to send children out of the room or have to explain why mommy and daddy’s faces were turning red, some of this is more the fault of how the Evangelical subculture is structured sociologically than the result of Christian political participation per say.

All throughout Sunday school and the Christian day school environment, those spending most of their lives in this branch of the Christian faith are conditioned with the assumption that those holding professional ministry positions such as pastors and missionaries are some how a cut above the remainder of the congregation even though the traditional Protestant position held to the priesthood of all believers and that all moral work was as equally holy. As such, it is no wonder most believers are paralyzed unless there is a so-called "man of the cloth" there on the scene to direct their every movement. Thus, it was only natural that clergy such as Falwell and Kennedy would have to play prominent roles in these movements.

Ironically, at earlier stages in his career, Thomas was one of the most eloquent voices urging Christian youth to consider callings in fields other than professional ministry such as government, politics, and the media. He even one time quipped he did not recall any Christian being called to serve Christ part time.

However, now that he’s had his career, Thomas concludes that "...a Christian’s primary responsibility is telling people the ’good news’ that redemption comes only through Jesus Christ." If that’s the case, is Thomas going to repose himself from commenting on sociopolitical matters in favor of more monastic or missional undertakings or is it part of a more natural inclination of not wanting to share notoriety. For in another column Thomas lamented the rise of consumer choice as exemplified by the growth of talk radio and the blogosphere and instead enunciated a preference that the masses all sup of the same information from the swill placed before them by traditional journalists as the nation’s media gatekeepers.


Talk about it...

Dr. Ronald Shultz

commented on Jul 6, 2009

I think the keyword to this is balance. Had the Christian world been about the main business of the Church; ie evangelism, discipleship (sound doctrine not entertainment),personal and corporate holiness the political and cultural scene would look vastly different. Yes, as citizens of this country we should be involved in all aspects of life as the salt of the earth, but our unbalanced emphasis on politics in the past several decades has stunted our calling as the citizens of Heaven or the Kingdom. Our resources and energies were concentrated on the temporal instead of the eternal. In the end, both areas suffered and we see the effects of that imbalance in the culture and the Church. We must now concentrate or restoring our relationship to Christ and the mission He ordained us to if we hope to see any change in the culture prior to our depature though this age of apostasy will not be overturned. We can only hope to save souls as we know, by prophecy, that the end of the age will only see evil men wax worse and worse and hence so also will the culture become desperately wicked. The kosmos or world system is damned. There is no hope for it. There is only hope for souls. We can, through obeying our mandate, cause some periods of remission and even get some good vital signs here and there but the patient is terminal. Do we give up? No, we must be about our Father''s business and as we grow stronger in Him we shall win some victories before He who now letteth is taken away. Yet, we must not delude ourselves into thinking the patient can be healed. Win souls, disciple, be holy while engaging the culture through the ballot box and other means yet use you best weapons that are spiritual or plan on failing miserably. Oh, too late, we have failed miserably already. Maranatha!

Join the discussion