Summary: A look at the life of King David, and what that might have to say to Christians today.
It hasn’t gone unnoticed that some of the MPs criticising the Murdochs and News International have a dubious track record in terms of expenses, and might therefore not be in a position to criticise the morals of others. Likewise, Stephen Fry remarked on the inappropriateness of any journalist criticising anyone over expenses when he said, “anybody can talk about snouts in troughs…for journalists to do so is almost beyond belief. I know lots of journalists, I know more journalists than politicians, and I’ve never met a more venal and disgusting crowd of people when it comes to expenses and allowances.” I’m sure I could find someone criticising Stephen Fry if I’d been bothered to try hard enough. My point is that everyone’s a mixture of good and bad. We might well see more of the bad in journalists and MPs, and more of the good in Stephen Fry, but everyone’s a mixture of good and bad, to some extent. I’m sure we know that about ourselves.
This mixture of good and bad is seen very clearly indeed in King David. On the good side, he trusted God completely when he went out to fight the giant Goliath. He twice refrained from killing King Saul when the latter was in David's power, and he was kind to Saul's crippled son Me-phib-o-sheth. David united the twelve tribes under God, and won independence from their marauding neighbours. David wrote many beautiful psalms, redolent with faith and trust in God. On the bad side, King David had Uriah the Hittite killed in battle so that David could marry Uriah's wife Bathsheba. He killed many enemies in battle; but that was normal for the period. But his was a remarkable career. From being a mere shepherd boy, God had raised him to the throne of the kingdom of Israel. Yet he claimed none of the credit for himself; he prayed, “who am I, O Lord GOD, and what is my house, that you have brought me thus far?”
The word “house” was used in those days to refer to the extended family, including past and future generations, nothing really to do with a dwelling. King David asked God to promise that his descendants would sit on the throne of Israel for ever. David obviously had a pretty hazy idea about what eternity means, but God made David a promise: there would always be a descendant of his to sit on the throne in Jerusalem. Now in fact the last King of Israel was Ze-rub-babel, who failed to re-establish the monarchy after the Jews returned from exile in Babylon. But Jesus was descended from King David; his family tree's laid out in the first chapter of St Matthew's Gospel and the third chapter of St Luke, showing that his father Joseph was a descendant of David. So Jesus was hailed as the “Son of David”; it was this which made him such a threat to King Herod and the High Priests, who foresaw their power draining away to the usurper. For this they killed him, and it appeared that once again there was no descendant of David on the throne of Israel. But, as we now know, Jesus rose again from the dead, and ascended into heaven. So David's prayer was answered after all, and his descendant rules in power for evermore, and millions of Christians around the world acknowledge him as their king. The rule of Jesus isn't limited to one ethnic group. He himself said, “I tell you, many will come from east and west and will eat with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven.”