Summary: Evolution is gibberish.
“These ‘creation-science’ textbooks, if allowed in our schools, can only serve to increase that mental anguish by teaching that the Genesis gibberish is a legitimate scientific theory.”
– G. Richard Bozarth, The Meaning of Evolution, American Atheist, p. 19, September 20, 1979.
For more go to www.answersingenesis.org
There were a couple of movies awhile back called, "Look Who’s Talking". This quote makes think look who’s talking gibberish. The fantasy fairy tale of evolution is such gibberish that it is like one of the bad trips on LSD back in the 60’s. It has some flash and color and titillates the mind but it has no substance or reality and can only cause great harm and even death. Indeed, Darwin’s folly has produced great suffering and death in that both Hitler and Stalin were true disciples of Darwin as are many in our country and around the world who ruthlessly slaughter the innocent and weak.
Talk about mental anguish. Imagine the mental and physical anguish that many feel believing that they are only high tech apes and just die like dogs and rot. Any wonder why suicide is on the rise? Why deal with sorrow, ill health, or anything? Kill babies, old folks, and the disabled rather then letting them take up space and supplies. Thin the herd and go back to selective breeding like Hitler. That is the legacy of Darwin’s insanity.
Evolution is a death wish. The best it can offer us is that some day the sun will burn out killing us all here and ultimately the universe will burn out as well so that no life will exist anywhere. Scrooge was right. Mankind is a blight upon the earth, but then what does it matter if it all ends up in a frozen lifeless universe no matter what we do. We might be able to run from Class M planet to Class M planet for a while but ultimately we will just die. Hopeless despair is all their pseudo-science can give us. Yep, that is the best the evolution gibberish can give us and they would burden us with this despair with no real scientific proof just fables and vain imaginations,
Is it not great that while God requires that we have faith He gives us some things that real science can point to as His signature or fingerprints in order to confound the wise of this world and refute their ignorance they falsely call science? True science affirms God’s Word.
17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. (KJV)
As a small consideration I submit the following as well.
1 Cor 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? (KJV)
I am an old hippy and long hair for men was in vogue then and there are still some hanging on but must of us have hair that was like us in that it has dropped out. One of the songs from "Hair" said,
"I would just like to say that it is my opinion that longer hair and other flamboyant affections of appearance of nothing more than the male’s emergence from his drab camouflage into the gaudy plumage which is the birth right of his sex. There is a peculiar notion that fine feathers and elegant plumage are not proper for the male when actually that is the way things are in most species."
Our singer was appealing to nature and evolution as justification for his hairstyle. Is it just a curiosity that the human females have always been the decorated ones or the objects of beauty or is it because we are not a higher breed of ape or amoeba but rather have instilled with us to honor and adorn the ladies because Christ will one day honor and adorn His Bride?