Sermons

Summary: This sermon highlights the anger of Herod against King Jesus. The anger against King Jesus is seen in his trip to Egypt.

  Study Tools

Scripture

Today is the fourth Sunday of Advent. For this season of Advent I am preaching a series of sermons titled, “The Advent of the King,” which is based on Matthew’s Gospel chapters 1 and 2.

The first week we examined “The Ancestry of the King” in Matthew 1:1-17, and learned about the human ancestry of Jesus.

The second week we examined “The Arrival of the King” in Matthew 1:18-25, and learned about the divine ancestry of Jesus.

The third week we examined “The Adoration of the King” in Matthew 2:1-12, and learned about different responses to Jesus.

Today, we will examine “The Anger against the King” in Matthew 2:13-18. Let us read Matthew 2:13-18:

13 When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. “Get up,” he said, “take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.”

14 So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, 15 where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

16 When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. 17 Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was fulfilled:

18 “A voice is heard in Ramah,

weeping and great mourning,

Rachel weeping for her children

and refusing to be comforted,

because they are no more.” (Matthew 2:13-18 (NIV)

Introduction

The apostle Matthew wrote his Gospel in order to show that Jesus really was the long-expected Messiah, who was born king of the Jews.

Since Matthew was writing for a largely Jewish audience, his book is filled with facts that would interest them. John MacArthur points out in his commentary on Matthew that Matthew gives several evidences of Jesus of Nazareth’s legitimate, unique, and absolute royal right to the throne of David.

In Matthew 1 we see the evidence of Jesus’ royal genealogy. Jesus was descended from King David and was heir to his throne.

The next evidence, also in Matthew 1, was of Jesus’ supernatural conception and virgin birth. Jesus’ deity was established by virtue of his being supernaturally conceived by the Holy Spirit.

The third evidence in Matthew 2 is the testimony of the Magi, who came to worship Jesus and give gifts to “the one who has been born king of the Jews” (2:2). The Magi traveled a great distance to recognize and honor a king who was largely rejected by his own people.

The next evidence of Jesus’ kingship is shown in a negative way through the antagonism and hatred of Herod. Herod’s devious scheme to discover and destroy this unknown baby shows his fear that the Magi’s declaration about the child could be correct, and gives unintended testimony to Jesus’ true royalty. Herod knew that he himself was a usurper to the throne on which he sat only by virtue of Rome—who ruled Judah only by the “right” of military force. Herod was an Edomite, not a Jew, and had no legitimate claim to be the Jew’s king. He therefore feared and hated even the suggestion of a rival claimant. But even the hatred of the false king gave indirect testimony to the identity of the true king.


Talk about it...

Nobody has commented yet. Be the first!

Join the discussion